THE SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963

Posted on
  • Wednesday, October 16, 2013
  • in
  • Labels: ,
  • The Specific Relief Act, 1963

    CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY
    CHAPTER I RECOVERING POSSESSION OF PROPERTY
    CHAPTER II SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE OF CONTRACTS
    CHAPTER III RECTIFICATION OF INSTRUMENTS
    CHAPTER IV RESCISSION OF CONTRACTS
    CHAPTER V CANCELLATION OF INSTRUMENTS
    CHAPTER VI DECLARATORY DECREES
    CHAPTER VII INJUNCTIONS GENERALLY
    CHAPTER VIII PERPETUAL INJUNCTIONS

    PART I
    PRELIMINARY

    1.Short title, extent and commencement.
    1. Short title, extent and commencement.- (1) This Act may be called the Specific Relief Act,
    1963.(2) It extends to the whole of India except the State of Jammu and Kashmir.
    (3) It shall come into force on such date 1* as the Central
    Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint.

    2.Definitions.
    2. Definitions.- In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,-
    (a) "obligation" includes every duty enforceable by law;
    (b) "settlement" means an instrument (other than a will or codicil as defined by the Indian
    Succession Act, 1925.(39 of 1925)) whereby the destination or devolution of successive
    interests in movable or immovable property is disposed of or is agreed to be disposed of;
    (c) "trust" has the same meaning as in section 3 of the
    Indian Trusts Act, 1882 (2 of 1882), and includes an obligation in the nature of a trust within
    the meaning of Chapter IX of that Act;
    (d) "trustee" includes every person holding property in trust;
    (e) all other words and expressions used herein but not defined, and defined in the Indian
    Contract Act, 1872.(9 of 1872), have the meanings respectively assigned to them in that Act.

    3.Savings.
    3. Savings.- Except as otherwise provided herein, nothing in this
    Act shall be deemed-
    (a) to deprive any person of any right to relief, other than specific performance, which he
    may have under any contract; or
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    1 1st March, 1964; vide Notification No. S.O. 189, dated 13-1-1964, Gazette of India, Pt. II,
    Sec. 3 (ii), p. 214.The Act shall come into force in the State of Sikkim on 1.9.1984.vide
    Notifn. No. S.O.648 (E), dt. 24.8.84, Gaz. of India, Exty.
    Pt. II, Sec. 3 (ii).
    616.(b) to affect the operation of the Indian Registration Act,
    1908 (16 of 1908), on documents.

    4.Specific relief to be granted only for enforcing individual civilrights and not for enforcing
    penal laws.
    4. Specific relief to be granted only for enforcing individual civil rights and not for enforcing
    penal laws.-Specific relief can be granted only for the purpose of enforcing individual civil
    rights and not for the mere purpose of enforcing a penal law.

    CHAPTER I
    RECOVERING POSSESSION OF PROPERTY

    5.Recovery of specific immovable property.
    5. Recovery of specific immovable property.-A person entitled to the possession of specific
    immovable property may recover it in the manner provided by the Code of Civil Procedure,
    1908 (5 of 1908).

    6.Suit by person dispossessed of immovable property.
    6. Suit by person dispossessed of immovable property.-(1) If any person is dispossessed
    without his consent of immovable property otherwise than in due course of law, he or any
    person claiming through him may, by suit, recover possession thereof, notwithstanding any
    other title that may be set up in such suit.
    (2) No suit under this section shall be brought-
    (a) after the expiry of six months from the date of dispossession; or
    (b) against the Government.
    (3) No appeal shall lie from any order or decree passed in any suit instituted under this
    section, nor shall any review of any such order or decree be allowed.
    (4) Nothing in this section shall bar any person from suing to establish his title to such
    property and to recover possession thereof.

    7.Recovery of specific movable property.
    7. Recovery of specific movable property.- A person entitled to the possession of specific
    movable property may recover it in the manner provided by the Code of Civil Procedure,
    1908 (5 of 1908).
    Explanation 1.-A trustee may sue under this section for the possession of movable property
    to the beneficial interest in which the person for whom he is trustee is entitled.
    .Explanation 2.-A special or temporary right to the present possession of movable
    property is sufficient to support a suit under this section.

    8.Liability of person in possession, not as owner, to deliver to personsentitled to immediate
    possession.
    8. Liability of person in possession, not as owner, to deliver to persons entitled to immediate
    possession.- Any person having the possession or control of a particular article of movable
    property, of which he is not the owner, may be compelled specifically to deliver it to the
    person entitled to its immediate possession, in any of the following cases:-
    (a) when the thing claimed is held by the defendant as the agent or trustee of the plaintiff;
    (b) when compensation in money would not afford the plaintiff adequate relief for the loss of
    the thing claimed;
    (c) when it would be extremely difficult to ascertain the actual damage caused by its loss;
    (d) when the possession of the thing claimed has been wrongfully transferred from the
    plaintiff.
    Explanation.-Unless and until the contrary is proved, the court shall, in respect of any article
    of movable property claimed under clause (b) or clause (c) of this section, presume-
    (a) that compensation in money would not afford the plaintiff adequate relief for the loss of
    the thing claimed, or, as the case may be;
    (b) that it would be extremely difficult to ascertain the actual damage caused by its loss.

    CHAPTER II
    SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE OF CONTRACTS

    9.Defences respecting suits for relief based on contract.
    9. Defences respecting suits for relief based on contract.-Except as otherwise provided
    herein, where any relief is claimed under this
    Chapter in respect of a contract, the person against whom the relief is claimed may plead by
    way of defence any ground which is available to him under any law relating to contracts.

    CONTRACTS WHICH CAN BE SPECIFICALLY ENFORCED

    10.Cases in which specific performance of contract enforceable.
    10. Cases in which specific performance of contract enforceable.-
    Except as otherwise provided in this Chapter, the specific performance of any contract may,
    in the discretion of the court, be enforced-
    (a) when there exists no standard for ascertaining the actual damage caused by the nonperformance
    of the act agreed to be done; or
    (b) when the act agreed to be done is such that compensation in money for its nonperformance
    would not afford adequate relief.
    Explanation.-Unless and until the contrary is proved, the court shall presume-
    (i) that the breach of a contract to transfer immovable property cannot be adequately
    relieved by compensation in money; and
    (ii) that the breach of a contract to transfer movable property can be so relieved except in the
    following cases:-
    (a) where the property is not an ordinary article of commerce, or is of special value or
    interest to the plaintiff, or consists of goods which are not easily obtainable in the market;
    (b) where the property is held by the defendant as the agent or trustee of the plaintiff.

    11.Cases in which specific performance of contracts connected with trusts enforceable.
    11. Cases in which specific performance of contracts connected with trusts enforceable.-(1)
    Except as otherwise provided in this Act, specific performance of a contract may, in the
    discretion of the court, be enforced when the act agreed to be done is in the performance
    wholly or partly of a trust.
    (2) A contract made by a trustee in excess of his powers or in breach of trust cannot be
    specifically enforced.

    12.Specific performance of part of contract.
    12. Specific performance of part of contract.- (1) Except as otherwise hereinafter provided in
    this section, the court shall not direct the specific performance of a part of a contract.
    (2) Where a party to a contract is unable to perform the whole of his part of it, but the part
    which must be left unperformed bears only a small proportion to the whole in value and
    admits of compensation in money, the court may, at the suit of either party, direct the
    specific performance of so much of the contract as can be performed, and award
    compensation in money for the deficiency.
    (3) Where a party to a contract is unable to perform the whole of his part of it, and the part
    which must be left unperformed either-
    (a) forms a considerable part of the whole, though admiting of compensation in money; or
    (b) does not admit of compensation in money;
    he is not entitled to obtain a decree for specific performance; but the court may, at the
    suit of the other party, direct the party in default to perform specifically so much of his part of
    the contract as he can perform, if the other party-
    (i) in a case falling under clause (a), pays or has paid the agreed consideration for the whole
    of the contract reduced by the consideration for the part which must be left unperformed and
    in a case falling under clause
    (b), 1*[pays or has paid] the consideration for the whole of the contract without any
    abatement; and
    (ii) in either case, relinquishes all claims to the performance of the remaining part of the
    contract and all right to compensation, either for the deficiency or for the loss or damage
    sustained by him through the default of the defendant.
    (4) When a part of a contract which, taken by itself, can and ought to be specifically
    performed, stands on a separate and independent footing from another part of the same
    contract which cannot or ought not to be specifically performed, the court may direct specific
    performance of the former part.
    Explanation.-For the purposes of this section, a party to a contract shall be deemed to be
    unable to perform the whole of his part of it if a portion of its subject-matter existing at the
    date of the contract has ceased to exist at the time of its performance.

    13.Rights of purchaser or lessee against person with no title or imperfect title.
    13. Rights of purchaser or lessee against person with no title or imperfect title.
     (1) Where a person contracts to sell or let certain immovable property having no title or only an imperfect
    title, the purchaser or lessee (subject to the other provisions of this
    Chapter), has the following rights, namely:-
    (a) if the vendor or lessor has subsequently to the contract acquired any interest in the
    property, the purchaser or lessee may compel him to make good the contract out of such
    interest;
    (b) where the concurrence of other persons is necessary for validating the title, and they are
    bound to concur at the request of the vendor or lessor, the purchaser or lessee may compel
    him to procure such concurrence, and when a conveyance by other persons is necessary to
    validate the title and they are bound to convey at the request of the vendor or lessor, the purchaser or lessee may compel him to procure such conveyance;
    (c) where the vendor professes to sell unencumbered property, but the property is
    mortgaged for an amount not exceeding the purchase money and the vendor has in fact only
    a right to redeem it, the purchaser may compel him to redeem the mortgage and to obtain a
    valid discharge, and, where necessary, also a conveyance from the mortgagee;
    (d) where the vendor or lessor sues for specific performance of the contract and the suit is
    dismissed on the ground of his want of title or imperfect title, the defendant has a right to a
    return of his deposit, if any, with interest thereon, to his costs of the suit, and to a lien for
    such deposit, interest and costs on the interest, if any, of the vendor or lessor in the property
    which is the subject-matter of the contract.
    (2) The provisions of sub-section (1) shall also apply, as far as may be, to contracts for the
    sale or hire of movable property.

    CONTRACTS WHICH CANNOT BE SPECIFICALLY ENFORCED

    14.Contracts not specifically enforceable.
    14. Contracts not specifically enforceable.-(1) The following contracts cannot be specifically
    enforced, namely:--
    (a) a contract for the non-performance of which compensation in money is an adequate
    relief;
    (b) a contract which runs into such minute or numerous details or which is so dependent on
    the personal qualifications or volition of the parties, or otherwise from its nature is such, that
    the court cannot enforce specific performance of its material terms;
    (c) a contract which is in its nature determinable;
    (d) a contract the performance of which involves the performance of a continuous duty which
    the court cannot supervise.
    (2) Save as provided by the Arbitration Act, 1940 (10 of 1940), no contract to refer present or
    future differences to arbitration shall be specifically enforced; but if any person who has made such a contract (other than an arbitration agreement to which the provisions of the said Act apply) and has refused to perform it, sues in respect of any subject which he has contracted to refer, the existence of such contract
    shall bar the suit.
    (3) Notwithstanding anything contained in clause (a) or clause
    (c) or clause (d) of sub-section (1), the court may enforce specific performance in the
    following cases:-
    (a) where the suit is for the enforcement of a contract,-
    (i) to execute a mortgage or furnish any other security for security for securing the
    repayment of any loan which the borrower is not willing to repay at once:
    Provided that where only a part of the loan has been advanced the lender is willing to
    advance the remaining part of the loan in terms of the contract; or
    (ii) to take up and pay for any debentures of a company;
    (b) where the suit is for,-
    (i) the execution of a formal deed of partnership, the parties having commenced to carry on
    the business of the partnership; or
    (ii) the purchase of a share of a partner in a firm,
    (c) where the suit is for the enforcement of a contract for the construction of any building or
    the execution of any other work on land:
    Provided that the following conditions are fulfilled, namely:-
    (i) the building or other work is described in the contract in terms sufficiently precise to
    enable the court to determine the exact nature of the building or work;
    (ii) the plaintiff has a substantial interest in the performance of the contract and the interest is
    of such a nature that compensation in money for non-performance of the contract is not an
    adequate relief; and
    (iii) the defendant has, in pursuance of the contract, obtained possession of the whole or any
    part of the land on which the building is to be constructed or other work is to be executed.

    PERSONS FOR OR AGAINST WHOM CONTRACTS MAY BE SPECIFICALLY
    ENFORCED

    15.Who may obtain specific performance.
    15. Who may obtain specific performance.- Except as otherwise provided by this Chapter,
    the specific performance of a contract may be obtained by-
    (a) any party thereto;
    (b) the representative in interest or the principal, of any party thereto:
    Provided that where the learning, skill, solvency or any personal quality of such party is a
    material ingredient in the contract, or where the contract provides that his interest shall not
    be assigned, his representative in interest of his principal shall not be entitled to specific
    performance of the contract, unless such party has already performed his part of the
    contract, or the performance thereof by his representative in interest, or his principal, has
    been accepted by the other party;
    (c) where the contract is a settlement on marriage, or a compromise of doubtful rights
    between members of the same family, any person beneficially entitled thereunder;
    (d) where the contract has been entered into by a tenant for life in due exercise of a power,
    the remainderman;
    (e) a reversioner in possession, where the agreement is a covenant entered into with his
    predecessor in title and the reversioner is entitled to the benefit of such covenant;
    (f) a reversioner in remainder, where the agreement is such a covenant, and the reversioner
    is entitled to the benefit thereof and will sustain material injury by reason of its breach;
    (g) when a company has entered into a contract and subsequently becomes amalgamated
    with another company, the new company which arises out of the amalgamation;
    (h) when the promoters of a company have, before its incorporation, entered into a contract
    for the purposes of the company, and such contract is warranted by the terms of the
    incorporation, the company:
    Provided that the company has accepted the contract and has communicated such
    acceptance to the other party to the contract.

    16.Personal bars to relief.
    16. Personal bars to relief.-Specific performance of a contract cannot be enforced in favour
    of a person-
    (a) who would not be entitled to recover compensation for its breach; or
    (b) who has become incapable of performing, or violates any essential term of, the contract
    that on his part remains to be performed, or acts in fraud of the contract, or wilfully acts at
    variance with, or in subversion of, the relation intended to be established by the contract; or
    (c) who fails to aver and prove that he has performed or has always been ready and willing
    to perform the essential terms of the contract which are to be performed by him, other than
    terms the performance of which has been prevented or waived by the defendant.
    Explanation.-For the purposes of clause (c),-
    (i) where a contract involves the payment of money, it is not essential for the plaintiff to
    actually tender to the defendant or to deposit in court any money except when so directed by
    the court;
    (ii) the plaintiff must aver performance of, or readiness and willingness to perform, the
    contract according to its true construction.

    17.Contract to sell or let property by one who has no title, notspecifically enforceable.
    17. Contract to sell or let property by one who has no title, not specifically enforceable.- (1) A
    contract to sell or let any immovable property cannot be specifically enforced in favour of a
    vendor or lessor-
    (a) who, knowing himself not to have any title to the property, has contracted to sell or let the
    property;
    (b) who, though he entered into the contract believing that he had a good title to the
    property, cannot at the time fixed by the parties or by the court for the completion of the sale
    or letting, give the purchaser or lessee a title free from reasonable doubt.
    (2) The provisions of sub-section (1) shall also apply, as far as may be, to contracts for the
    sale or hire of movable property.

    18.Non-enforcement except with variation.
    18. Non-enforcement except with variation.- Where a plaintiff seeks specific performance of
    a contract in writing, to which the defendant sets up a variation, the plaintiff
    cannot obtain the performance sought, except with the variation so set up, in the
    following cases, namely:-
    (a) where by fraud, mistake of fact or mis-representation, the written contract of which
    performance is sought is in its terms or effect different from what the parties agreed to, or
    does not contain all the terms agreed to between the parties on the basis of which the
    defendant entered into the contract;
    (b) where the object of the parties was to produce a certain legal result which the contract as
    framed is not calculated to produce;
    (c) where the parties have, subsequently to the execution of the contract, varied its terms.

    19.Relief against parties and persons claiming under them by subsequent title.
    19. Relief against parties and persons claiming under them by subsequent title.- Except as
    otherwise provided by this Chapter, specific performance of a contract may be enforced
    against-
    (a) either party thereto;
    (b) any other person claiming under him by a title arising subsequently to the contract,
    except a transferee for value who has paid his money in good faith and without notice of the
    original contract;
    (c) any person claiming under a title which, though prior to the contract and known to the
    plaintiff, might have been displaced by the defendant;
    (d) when a company has entered into a contract and subsequently becomes amalgamated
    with another company, the new company which arises out of the amalgamation;
    (e) when the promoters of a company have, before its incorporation, entered into a contract
    for the purpose of the company and such contract is warranted by the terms of the
    incorporation, the company:
    Provided that the company has accepted the contract and communicated such acceptance
    to the other party to the contract.

    DISCRETION AND POWERS OF COURT

    20.Discretion as to decreeing specific performance.
    20. Discretion as to decreeing specific performance.- (1) The jurisdiction to decree specific
    performance is discretionary, and the court is not bound to grant such relief merely because
    it is lawful to do so; but the discretion of the court is not arbitary but sound and reasonable, guided by judicial principles and capable of correction by a court of appeal.
    (2) The following are cases in which the court may properly exercise discretion not to decree
    specific performance  (a) where the terms of the contract or the conduct of the parties at the time of entering into the contract or the other circumstances under which the contract was entered into are such
    that the contract, though not voidable, gives the plaintiff an unfair advantage over the
    defendant; or
    (b) where the performance of the contract would involve some hardship on the defendant
    which he did not foresee, whereas its non-performance would involve no such hardship on
    the plaintiff;
    (c) where the defendant entered into the contract under circumstances which though not
    rendering the contract voidable, makes it inequitable to enforce specific performance.
    Explanation 1.-Mere inadequacy of consideration, or the mere fact that the contract is
    onerous to the defendant or improvident in its nature, shall not be deemed to constitute an
    unfair advantage within the meaning of clause (a) or hardship within the meaning of clause
    (b).
    Explanation 2.-The question whether the performance of a contract would involve hardship
    on the defendant within the meaning of clause (b) shall, except in cases where the hardship
    has resulted from any act of the plaintiff subsequent to the contract, be determined with
    reference to the circumstances existing at the time of the contract.
    (3) The court may properly exercise discretion to decree specific performance in any case
    where the plaintiff has done substantial acts or suffered losses in consequence of a contract
    capable of specific performance.
    (4) The court shall not refuse to any party specific performance of a contract merely on the
    ground that the contract is not enforceable at the instance of the other party.

    21.Power to award compensation in certain cases.
    21. Power to award compensation in certain cases.-(1) In a suit for specific performance of a
    contract, the plaintiff may also claim compensation for its breach, either in addition to, or in
    substitution of, such performance.
    (2) If, in any such suit, the court decides that specific performance ought not to be
    granted, but that there is a contract between the parties which has been broken by the
    defendant, and that the plaintiff is entitled to compensation for that breach, it shall award him
    such compensation accordingly.
    (3) If, in any such suit, the court decides that specific performance ought to be granted, but
    that is not sufficient to satisfy the justice of the case, and that some compensation for breach
    of the contract should also be made to the plaintiff, it shall award him such compensation
    accordingly.
    (4) In determining the amount of any compensation awarded under this section, the court
    shall be guided by the principles specified in section 73 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (9 of
    1872).
    (5) No compensation shall be awarded under this section unless the plaintiff has claimed
    such compensation in his plaint:
    Provided that where the plaintiff has not claimed any such compensation in the plaint, the
    court shall, at any stage of the proceeding, allow him to amend the plaint on such terms as
    may be just, for including a claim for such compensation.
    Explanation.-The circumstance that the contract has become incapable of specific
    performance does not preclude the court from exercising the jurisdiction conferred by this
    section.

    22.Power to grant relief for possession, partition, refund of earnest money, etc.
    22. Power to grant relief for possession, partition, refund of earnest money, etc.-(1)
    Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5
    of 1908), any person suing for the specific performance of a contract for the transfer of
    immovable property may, in an appropriate case, ask for-
    (a) possession, or partition and separate possession, of the property, in addition to such
    performance; or
    (b) any other relief to which he may be entitled, including the refund of any earnest money or
    deposit paid or
    1*[made by] him, in case his claim for specific performance is refused.
    (2) No relief under clause (a) or clause (b) of sub-section (1)
    shall be granted by the court unless it has been specifically claimed:
    Provided that where the plaintiff has not claimed any such relief in the plaint, the court shall,
    at any stage of the proceeding, allow him to amend the plaint on such terms as may be just for including a claim for such relief.
    (3) The power of the court to grant relief under clause (b) of sub-section (1) shall be without
    prejudice to its powers to award compensation under section 21.23.Liquidation of damages
    not a bar to specific performance.

    23. Liquidation of damages not a bar to specific performance.-(1)
    A contract, otherwise proper to be specifically enforced, may be so enforced, though a sum
    be named in it as the amount to be paid in case of its breach and the party in default is
    willing to pay the same, if the court, having regard to the terms of the contract and other
    attending circumstances, is satisfied that the sum was named only for the purpose of
    securing performance of the contract and not for the purpose of giving to the party in default
    an option of paying money in lieu of specific performance.
    (2) When enforcing specific performance under this section, the court shall not also decree
    payment of the sum so named in the contract.

    24.Bar of suit for compensation for breach after dismissal of suit for specific performance.
    24. Bar of suit for compensation for breach after dismissal of suit for specific performance.-
    The dismissal of a suit for specific performance of a contract or part thereof shall bar the
    plaintiffs right to sue for compensation for the breach of such contract or part, as the case
    may be, but shall not bar his right to sue for any other relief to which he may be entitled, by
    reason of such breach.

    ENFORCEMENT OF AWARDS AND DIRECTIONS TO EXECUTE SETTLEMENTS

    25.Application of preceding sections to certain awards and testamentary directions to
    execute settlements.
    25. Application of preceding sections to certain awards and testamentary directions to
    execute settlements.-The provisions of this
    Chapter as to contracts shall apply to awards to which the Arbitration
    Act, 1940 (10 of 1940), does not apply and to directions in a will or codicil to execute a
    particular settlement.

    CHAPTER III
    RECTIFICATION OF INSTRUMENTS

    26.When instrument may be rectified.
    26. When instrument may be rectified.-(1) When, through fraud or a mutual mistake of the
    parties, a contract or other instrument in writing (not being the articles
    628.of association of a company to which the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of
    1956), applies) does not express their real intention, then-
    (a) either party or his representative in interest may institute a suit to have the instrument
    rectified; or
    (b) the plaintiff may, in any suit in which any right arising under the instrument is in issue,
    claim in his pleading that the instrument be rectified; or
    (c) a defendant in any such suit as is referred to in clause
    (b), may, in addition to any other defence open to him, ask for rectification of the instrument.
    (2) If, in any suit in which a contract or other instrument is sought to be rectified under subsection
    (1), the court finds that the instrument, through fraud or mistake, does not express
    the real intention of the parties, the court may, in its discretion, direct rectification of the
    instrument so as to express that intention, so far as this can be done without prejudice to
    rights acquired by third persons in good faith and for value.
    (3) A contract in writing may first be rectified, and then if the party claiming rectification has
    so prayed in his pleading and the court thinks fit, may be specifically enforced.
    (4) No relief for the rectification of an instrument shall be granted to any party under this
    section unless it has been specifically claimed:
    Provided that where a party has not claimed any such relief in his pleading, the court shall,
    at any stage of the proceeding, allow him to amend the pleading on such terms as may be
    just for including such claim.

    CHAPTER IV
    RESCISSION OF CONTRACTS
    27.When rescission may be adjudged or refused.
    27. When rescission may be adjudged or refused.-(1) Any person interested in a contract
    may sue to have it rescinded, and such rescission may be adjudged by the court in any of
    the following cases, namely:-
    (a) where the contract is voidable or terminable by the plaintiff;
    (b) where the contract is unlawful for causes not apparent on its face and the defendant is
    more to blame than the plaintiff.
    629.(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), the court may refuse to
    rescind the contract-
    (a) where the plaintiff has expressly or impliedly ratified the contract; or
    (b) where, owing to the change of circumstances which has taken place since the making of
    the contract (not being due to any act of the defendant himself), the parties cannot be
    substantially restored to the position in which they stood when the contract was made; or
    (c) where third parties have, during the subsistence of the contract, acquired rights in good
    faith without notice and for value; or
    (d) where only a part of the contract is sought to be rescinded and such part is not severable
    from the rest of the contract.
    Explanation.-In this section "contract", in relation to the territories to which the Transfer of
    Property Act, 1882 (4 of 1882), does not extend, means a contract in writing.

    28.Rescission in certain circumstances of contracts for the sale or leaseof immovable
    property, the specific performance of which has been decreed.
    28. Rescission in certain circumstances of contracts for the sale or lease of immovable
    property, the specific performance of which has been decreed.- (1) Where in any suit a
    decree for specific performance of a contract for the sale or lease of immovable property has
    been made and the purchaser or lessee does not, within the period allowed by the decree or
    such further period as the court may allow, pay the purchase money or other sum which the
    court has ordered him to pay, the vendor or lessor may apply in the same suit in which the
    decree is made, to have the contract rescinded and on such application the court may, by
    order, rescind the contract either so far as egards the party in default or altogether, as the
    justice of the case may require.
    (2) Where a contract is rescinded under sub-section (1), the court(
    a) shall direct the purchaser or the lessee, if he has obtained possession of the property
    under the contract, to restore such possession to the vendor or lessor, and
    (b) may direct payment to the vendor or lessor of all the rents and profits which have
    accrued in respect of the property from the date on which possession was so obtained by
    the purchaser or lessee until restoration of possession to the vendor or lessor, and, if the
    justice of the case so requires, the refund of any sum paid by the vendee or
    lessee as earnest money or deposit in connection with the contract.
    (3) If the purchaser or lessee pays the purchase money or other sum which he is ordered to
    pay under the decree within the period referred to in sub-section (1), the court may, on
    application made in the same suit, award the purchaser or lessee such further relief as he
    may be entitled to, including in appropriate cases all or any of the following reliefs, namely:-
    (a) the execution of a proper conveyance or lease by the vendor or lessor;
    (b) the delivery of possession, or partition and separate possession, of the property on the
    execution of such conveyance or lease.
    (4) No separate suit in respect of any relief which may be claimed under this section shall lie
    at the instance of a vendor, purchaser, lessor or lessee, as the case may be.
    (5) The costs of any proceedings under this section shall be in the discretion of the court.

    29.Alternative prayer for rescission in suit for specific performance.
    29. Alternative prayer for rescission in suit for specific performance.- A plaintiff instituting a
    suit for the specific performance of a contract in writing may pray in the alternative that, if the
    contract cannot be specifically enforced, it may be rescinded and delivered up to be
    cancelled; and the court, if it refuses to enforce the contract specifically, may direct it to be
    rescinded and delivered up accordingly.
    30.
    Court may require parties rescinding to do equity.
    30. Court may require parties rescinding to do equity.- On adjudging the rescission of a
    contract, the court may require the party to whom such relief is granted to restore, so far as
    may be, any benefit which he may have received from the other party and to make any
    compensation to him which justice may require.

    CHAPTER V
    CANCELLATION OF INSTRUMENTS
    31.When cancellation may be ordered.
    31. When cancellation may be ordered.-(1) Any person against whom a written instrument is
    void or voidable, and who has reasonable apprehension that such instrument, if left
    outstanding may cause him serious injury, may sue to have it adjudged void or voidable; and
    the court may, in its discretion, so adjudge it and order it to be delivered up and cancelled.
    631.(2) If the instrument has been registered under the Indian
    Registration Act, 1908 (16 of 1908), the court shall also send a copy of its decree to the
    officer in whose office the instrument has been so registered; and such officer shall note on
    the copy of the instrument contained in his books the fact of its cancellation.

    32.What instruments may be partially cancelled.
    32. What instruments may be partially cancelled.- Where an instrument is evidence of
    different rights or different obligations, the court may, in a proper case, cancel it in part and
    allow it to stand for the residue.

    33.Power to require benefit to be restored or compensation to be madewhen instrument is
    cancelled or is succesfully resisted as being voidor voidable.
    33. Power to require benefit to be restored or compensation to be made when instrument is
    cancelled or is succesfully resisted as being void or voidable.-(1) On adjudging the
    cancellation of an instrument, the court may require the party to whom such relief is granted,
    to restore, so far as may be any benefit which he may have received from the other party
    and to make any compensation to him which justice may require.
    (2) Where a defendant successfully resists any suit on the ground-
    (a) that the instrument sought to be enforced against him in the suit is voidable, the court
    may if the defendant has received any benefit under the instrument from the other party,
    require him to restore, so far as may be, such benefit to that party or to make compensation
    for it;
    (b) that the agreement sought to be enforced against him in the suit is void by reason of his
    not having been competent to contract under section 11 of the Indian
    Contract Act, 1872 (9 of 1872), the court may, if the defendant has received any benefit
    under the agreement from the other party, require him to restore, so far as may be, such
    benefit to that party, to the extent to which he or his estate has benefited thereby.

    CHAPTER VI
    DECLARATORY DECREES

    34.Discretion of court as to declaration of status or right.
    34. Discretion of court as to declaration of status or right.-Any person entitled to any legal
    character, or to any right as to any property, may institute a suit against any person denying,
    or interested to deny, his title to such character or right, and the court may in its discretion
    make therein a declaration that he is so entitled, and the plaintiff need not in such suit ask for
    any further relief: Provided that no court shall make any such declaration where the plaintiff, being able to
    seek further relief than a mere declaration of title, omits to do so.
    Explanation.-A trustee of property is a "person interested to deny" a title adverse to the title
    of some one who is not in existence, and for whom, if in existence, he would be a trustee.

    35.Effect of declaration.
    35. Effect of declaration.-A declaration made under this Chapter is binding only on the
    parties to the suit, persons claiming through them respectively, and, where any of the parties
    are trustees, on the persons for whom, if in existence at the date of the declaration, such
    parties would be trustees.

    CHAPTER VII
    INJUNCTIONS GENERALLY

    36.Preventive relief how granted.
    36. Preventive relief how granted.-Preventive relief is granted at the discretion of the court by
    injunction, temporary or perpetual.

    37.Temporary and perpetual injunctions.
    37. Temporary and perpetual injunctions.- (1) Temporary injunctions are such as are to
    continue until a specified time, or until the further order of the court, and they may be granted
    at any stage of a suit, and are regulated by the Code of Civil Procedure,
    1908 (5 of 1908).
    (2) A perpetual injunction can only be granted by the decree made at the hearing and upon
    the merits of the suit; the defendant is thereby perpetually enjoined from the assertion of a
    right, or from the commission of an act, which would be contrary to the rights of the plaintiff.

    CHAPTER VIII
    PERPETUAL INJUNCTIONS

    38.Perpetual injunction when granted.
    38. Perpetual injunction when granted.-(1) Subject to the other provisions contained in or
    referred to by this Chapter, a perpetual injunction may be granted to the plaintiff to prevent
    the breach of an obligation existing in his favour, whether expressly or by implication.
    (2) When any such obligation arises from contract, the court shall be guided by the rules
    and provisions contained in Chapter II.
    (3) When the defendant invades or threatens to invade the plaintiffs right to, or enjoyment of,
    property, the court may grant a perpetual injunction in the following cases, namely:-
    (a) where the defendant is trustee of the property for the plaintiff;
    (b) where there exists no standard for ascertaining the actual damage caused, or likely to be
    caused, by the invasion;
    (c) where the invasion is such that compensation in money would not afford adequate relief;
    (d) where the injunction is necessary to prevent a multiplicity of judicial proceedings.
    39.Mandatory injunctions.
    39. Mandatory injunctions.-When, to prevent the breach of an obligation, it is necessary to
    compel the performance of certain acts which the court is capable of enforcing, the court
    may in its discretion grant an injunction to prevent the breach complained of, and also to
    compel performance of the requisite acts.

    40.
    Damages in lieu of, or in addition to, injunction.
    40. Damages in lieu of, or in addition to, injunction.-(1) The plaintiff in a suit for perpetual
    injunction under section 38, or mandatory injunction under section 39, may claim damages
    either in addition to, or in substitution for, such injunction and the court may, if it thinks fit,
    award such damages.
    (2) No relief for damages shall be granted under this section unless the plaintiff has claimed
    such relief in his plaint:
    Provided that where no such damages have been claimed in the plaint, the court shall, at
    any stage of the proceedings, allow the plaintiff to amend the plaint on such terms as may be
    just for including such claim.
    (3) The dismissal of a suit to prevent the breach of an obligation existing in favour of the
    plaintiff shall bar his right to sue for damages for such breach.

    41.Injunction when refused.
    41. Injunction when refused.-An injunction cannot be granted-
    (a) to restrain any person from prosecuting a judicial proceeding pending at the institution of
    the suit in which the
    634.injunction is sought, unless such restraint is necessary to prevent a multiplicity of
    proceedings;
    (b) to restrain any person from instituting or prosecuting any proceeding in a court not
    subordinate to that from which the injunction is sought;
    (c) to restrain any person from applying to any legislative body;
    (d) to restrain any person from instituting or prosecuting any proceeding in a criminal matter;
    (e) to prevent the breach of a contract the performance of which would not be specifically
    enforced;
    (f) to prevent, on the ground of nuisance, an act of which it is not reasonably clear that it will
    be a nuisance;
    (g) to prevent a continuing breach in which the plaintiff has acquiesced;
    (h) when equally efficacious relief can certainly be obtained by any other usual mode of
    proceeding except in case of breach of trust;
    (i) when the conduct of the plaintiff or his agents has been such as to disentitle him to the
    assistance of the court;
    (j) when the plaintiff has no personal interest in the matter.

    42.Injunction to perform negative agreement.
    42. Injunction to perform negative agreement.- Notwithstanding anything contained in clause
    (e) of section 41, where a contract comprises an affirmative agreement to do a certain act,
    coupled with a negative agreement, express or implied, not to do a certain act, the
    circumstance that the court is unable to compel specific performance of the affirmative
    agreement shall not preclude it from granting an injunction to perform the negative
    agreement:
    Provided that the plaintiff has not failed to perform the contract so far as it is binding on him.
    43.[Repealed.]
    43. [Amendment of Act 10 of 1940.] Rep. by Act 56 of 1974, s. 2.and Sch. I.
    44.[Repealed.]
    44. [Repeal] Rep. by s. 2 and Sch. I, ibid.

    0 comments:

    Post a Comment